🔗 Share this article

One of the most iconic photographs of the 20th century depicts an unclothed girl, her hands spread wide, her features contorted in agony, her flesh scorched and peeling. She is dashing toward the lens as fleeing an airstrike in South Vietnam. Nearby, additional kids also run out of the bombed hamlet in the area, with a scene of thick fumes and soldiers.

This International Impact of a Single Picture

Just after the publication during the Vietnam War, this picture—formally titled The Terror of War—became an analog hit. Viewed and debated by millions, it's widely hailed for motivating public opinion critical of the American involvement in Vietnam. A prominent author afterwards remarked how this deeply lasting photograph featuring nine-year-old Kim Phúc suffering likely was more effective to increase public revulsion against the war compared to lengthy broadcasts of broadcast atrocities. An esteemed English photojournalist who documented the conflict described it the ultimate photograph from what would later be called the televised conflict. A different veteran war journalist stated how the picture stands as in short, among the most significant photographs ever taken, specifically from that conflict.

A Long-Held Attribution and a Recent Assertion

For over five decades, the photo was credited to the work of a South Vietnamese photographer, a then-21-year-old local photographer employed by an international outlet at the time. However a controversial recent documentary released by a global network claims which states the well-known photograph—widely regarded as the peak of combat photography—was actually taken by someone else present that day during the attack.

As claimed by the film, "Napalm Girl" was actually captured by an independent photographer, who sold the images to the organization. The claim, and the film’s following inquiry, stems from a former editor Carl Robinson, who states how the influential editor ordered him to alter the photograph's attribution from the freelancer to Nick Út, the sole employed photographer on site at the time.

The Search for the Real Story

The source, advanced in years, emailed a filmmaker a few years ago, asking for help to identify the unknown cameraman. He expressed how, if he could be found, he hoped to offer an apology. The filmmaker thought of the freelance photojournalists he worked with—comparing them to current independents, who, like Vietnamese freelancers in that era, are routinely marginalized. Their contributions is frequently doubted, and they work under much more difficult situations. They lack insurance, they don’t have pensions, minimal assistance, they often don’t have proper gear, and they remain extremely at risk as they capture images in their own communities.

The filmmaker asked: “What must it feel like to be the man who captured this photograph, if indeed Nick Út didn’t take it?” As a photographer, he imagined, it must be extraordinarily painful. As an observer of photojournalism, especially the vaunted documentation of Vietnam, it could prove earth-shattering, perhaps legacy-altering. The respected heritage of the photograph in the diaspora is such that the director whose parents fled during the war felt unsure to engage with the project. He said, I hesitated to unsettle this long-held narrative attributed to Nick the photograph. And I didn’t want to change the existing situation within a population that had long admired this success.”

The Inquiry Progresses

But the two the filmmaker and the creator felt: it was important asking the question. As members of the press are to keep the world accountable,” noted the journalist, it is essential that we are willing to pose challenging queries of ourselves.”

The film follows the investigators as they pursue their own investigation, from testimonies from observers, to public appeals in modern Saigon, to reviewing records from other footage captured during the incident. Their efforts eventually yield a name: a freelancer, working for NBC that day who sometimes sold photographs to the press on a freelance basis. According to the documentary, a moved the man, currently in his 80s residing in the US, states that he provided the famous picture to the agency for a small fee and a copy, only to be plagued by the lack of credit for years.

This Reaction and Further Scrutiny

He is portrayed throughout the documentary, reserved and reflective, however, his claim turned out to be incendiary in the world of photojournalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to